<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synthetic Testing of Automatic Transmissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/2010/02/synthetic-testing-of-automatic-transmissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/2010/02/synthetic-testing-of-automatic-transmissions/</link>
	<description>Data Centers, Virtualization, and Cloud Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 01:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Gourlay</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/2010/02/synthetic-testing-of-automatic-transmissions/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Gourlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/?p=175#comment-281</guid>
		<description>ouch! :)  

Which one did I design that does not support 1/10GbE?  Just want to ake sure it is one I worked on...  (although I did work on quite a few...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ouch! <img src='http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>Which one did I design that does not support 1/10GbE?  Just want to ake sure it is one I worked on&#8230;  (although I did work on quite a few&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midnitedew</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/2010/02/synthetic-testing-of-automatic-transmissions/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>midnitedew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/?p=175#comment-280</guid>
		<description>I used to respect you until you started blogging crap like this. Hmm, why doesnt the DC switch you designed support 1/10GE. Doh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to respect you until you started blogging crap like this. Hmm, why doesnt the DC switch you designed support 1/10GE. Doh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHY Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/2010/02/synthetic-testing-of-automatic-transmissions/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>PHY Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 03:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasgourlay.com/blog/?p=175#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one possible explanation of how it &quot;makes sense&quot; for the Cat6k 10GBASE-T blade to only support 10G mode: who wants to spend $1,400 on a 1G port?!?!?!

Seriously, anyone who thinks that retro-bolting a sinfully expensive &quot;10GBASE-T&quot; card (which isn&#039;t anywhere near line-rate, and can&#039;t link up with anything except 10G link partners) into their decrepit Cat6k is &quot;investment protection&quot; should check out the Arista 48-port 10GBASE-T switch: for about the same price, you&#039;ll get 48 LINE-RATE 10G ports capable of 10G/1G/100M -- 12x the performance, and infinitely more flexible!

The annual SMARTnet support cost on a Cat6k is about the same $$$ as buying a higher-performance Arista switch!

So if you&#039;re a big Cat6k customer, you might consider letting your SMARTnet lapse on one or two of your Cat6ks, and taking that money to try out a couple of Arista boxes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one possible explanation of how it &#8220;makes sense&#8221; for the Cat6k 10GBASE-T blade to only support 10G mode: who wants to spend $1,400 on a 1G port?!?!?!</p>
<p>Seriously, anyone who thinks that retro-bolting a sinfully expensive &#8220;10GBASE-T&#8221; card (which isn&#8217;t anywhere near line-rate, and can&#8217;t link up with anything except 10G link partners) into their decrepit Cat6k is &#8220;investment protection&#8221; should check out the Arista 48-port 10GBASE-T switch: for about the same price, you&#8217;ll get 48 LINE-RATE 10G ports capable of 10G/1G/100M &#8212; 12x the performance, and infinitely more flexible!</p>
<p>The annual SMARTnet support cost on a Cat6k is about the same $$$ as buying a higher-performance Arista switch!</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;re a big Cat6k customer, you might consider letting your SMARTnet lapse on one or two of your Cat6ks, and taking that money to try out a couple of Arista boxes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
